Breast and fibroglandular tissue segmentation


Logo for Breast and fibroglandular tissue segmentation

About

Image Version:
1bfee743-6279-4d06-a080-2d7bf86252ee
Last updated:
May 6, 2022, 10:57 a.m.
Associated publication:
Samperna R, Moriakov N, Karssemeijer N, Teuwen J, Mann RM. Exploiting the Dixon Method for a Robust Breast and Fibro-Glandular Tissue Segmentation in Breast MRI. Diagnostics. 2022;12(7):1690.

Interfaces

This algorithm implements all of the following input-output combinations:

Inputs Outputs
1
  • T1 MRI (Image)
  • Breast and FGT Segmentation (Segmentation)
  • Model Facts

    Summary

    This algorithm produces a volumetric segmentation mask for the fatty tissue and the fibroglandular tissue (FGT) in the breast given as input either a fat (FS) or without fat suppression (WOFS) T1 breast MR acquisition. The output of this algorithm allows to easily calculate breast density from a FS or WOFS T1 breast MR acquisition.

    Mechanism

    The algorithm is a fully automated deep learning segmentation network. The network architecture is based on the nnUNet framework.

    For more details, please refer to our article: Exploiting the Dixon Method for a Robust Breast and Fibro-Glandular Tissue Segmentation in Breast MRI

    Validation and Performance

    We compared a network trained with only without fat-suppression (WOFS-only) T1 breast MR acquisitions and a network trained with both WOFS and FS (WOFS + FS) T1 breast MRI acquisitions. Below you can find the Dice Similarity Coefficient (DSC) on 9 held-out test cases from our internal dataset for both networks.

    Network trained on Test Breast DSC [95% CI] FGT DSC [95% CI]
    WOFS-only WOFS 0.96 [0.94, 0.97] 0.92 [0.89, 0.95]
    FS 0.10 [0.08, 0.12] 0.15 [0.11, 0.19]
    WOFS + FS WOFS 0.96 [0.95, 0.97] 0.91 [0.87, 0.94]
    FS 0.95 [0.94, 0.96] 0.86 [0.82, 0.91]

    Uses and Directions

    This algorithm was developed for research purposes only.

    Warnings

    Common Error Messages

    Information on this algorithm has been provided by the Algorithm Editors, following the Model Facts labels guidelines from Sendak, M.P., Gao, M., Brajer, N. et al. Presenting machine learning model information to clinical end users with model facts labels. npj Digit. Med. 3, 41 (2020). 10.1038/s41746-020-0253-3