Tibia bone and implant segmentation


Logo for Tibia bone and implant segmentation

About

Creator:

User Mugshot CaroM 

Contact email:
Image Version:
072177b6-53cf-47f7-adee-2ae3fe8cc5d4
Last updated:
Dec. 2, 2024, 3:34 p.m.
Associated publication:
Magg C, ter Wee MA, Buijs GS, et al.. Towards automation in non-invasive measurement of knee implant displacement. Astley SM, Chen W, eds.. Medical Imaging 2024: Computer-Aided Diagnosis. Published online April 3, 2024:24.

Interfaces

This algorithm implements all of the following input-output combinations:

Inputs Outputs
1
  • CT Image (Image)
  • Tibia implant and bone segmentation - unilateral (Segmentation)
  • Model Facts

    Summary

    This model is based on convolutional neural networks and uses 3D CT scans of knee implants as input. 4 models trained on different dataset partitions are applied and their results are aggregated to an ensemble for the final segmentation mask. The model was developed in 2023-2024 at the Amsterdam UMC, location UvA, in the Netherlands. The first validation results of the model were published in Magg et al. (2024). In the meantime, the model has been updated and retrained with an updated datasets (see current results in Validation and performance section).

    Mechanism

    Input:

    • Data type: 3D CT scan of the lower leg (femur TKA component to ankle joint).
    • File format: NIFTI or MHA file
    • Target population: patients with a TKA (total knee arthoplasty)

    Output:

    • Data type: Segmentation with 2 classes:
      • the tibial TKA component (voxel value 1)
      • the tibial cortex bone (voxel value 2)
    • File format: MHA file

    Model type: Convolutional neural network

    Validation and Performance

    • Evaluation metrics: Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) and 95%-percentile Hausdorff distance (HD95).
    • Ground truth: manually drawn segmentation mask of the tibia bone and implant component.
    • Test set: 4 fold patient-based cross-validation
    • Results: the network achieved an average DSC of 95.56% with an HD95 of 0.58 mm.

    Uses and Directions

    This algorithm was developed for research purposes only.

    Warnings

    Do not use this model in an external setting without further evaluation.

    Common Error Messages

    Information on this algorithm has been provided by the Algorithm Editors, following the Model Facts labels guidelines from Sendak, M.P., Gao, M., Brajer, N. et al. Presenting machine learning model information to clinical end users with model facts labels. npj Digit. Med. 3, 41 (2020). 10.1038/s41746-020-0253-3