request for clarification of rules

Dear organizers: Thanks for your effort for organizing the challenge. I have two questions about details of rules which may be required for my following arrangement for this challenge. 1. As the rule stated: After the final ranking is released, high-ranking teams will be invited to submit a description of their methods (no more than 2 pages). What the clear definition of high-ranking teams, does that mean top-3 or else? 2. The rule said that if the generated images are not visually clear enough, the submission will be evaluated as invalid. Are there some examples for us to know to what extent is the generated images classified as "not visually clear", and what is "visually clear"? Thanks and wait for your reply~

Thank you for participating in our Challenge! We are glad to answer your questions: 1.During the preparation stage of the challenge, we have no way to estimate the participation of the challenge, therefore, we did not determine how many teams to invite to co-submit to a journal. We plan to invite as many invitations as possible based on the number of participating teams (no less than 5). 2.Due to the variety of generated images, we cannot provide a comprehensive list of generated IHC images that affect the doctors' observation and diagnosis. We can provide some examples for the reference of the participants: https://github.com/bupt-ai-cz/BCI/blob/main/imgs/examples.png