Hi, all your deadlines have been postponed.
So far it was because of problems on your side: wrong input spec, wrong metric definition, wrong metric computation, too slow evaluation code, etc. We all played by your constantly changing rules without complaining much. And now this.
What is the reason for this one?
If it is because some teams have not delivered their content in time then they should not qualify. If you accept them then it is unfair as some teams would have got more time than others. This is unfair to all teams who met your deadlines.
Besides potential unfairness, you require top teams to present at the workshop, yet you do not announce which teams are top teams before the workshop. Do you assume people will take the risk to come and not appear on the leaderboard? Can you at least publish now he top 3 or top 5 teams in each task?
Last, but not least, people on our team, and probably on other teams, assumed your deadlines were true deadlines and had other plans after these. Given you postponed all deadlines very lately, these plans were jeopardised. For instance some people had to cancel vacations with their families for instance.
I hope you will ensure fairness in team evaluations, and I also hope you will learn from the organisation issues we had to deal with.